Is coronavirus ‘one season phenomena’, elicit blood clot unwisely to die with the host and face F.I.R for a crime none knows

More we chase and prosecute the virus more shall be the proliferation rate of the virus.  Like the Phoenix bird, the virus is emerging from everywhere but our government is constantly denying the community transmission of novel coronavirus.  One famous virologist humorously commented that may be ghosts and evil forces in the night are infecting people and in the day the government is detecting the virus and claims such transmission is not due to community entry of the virus. 

What is the real crime of novel coronavirus? 

                                                    

1.     Is the virus ‘new’ to mankind, therefore it is called ‘novel’ and is the ‘newness’ the real crime of the virus? 

2.     Does that mean nothing new should emerge or evolve on this planet without prior permission of man? 

3.     Because the virus is new and man is ignorant about the virus, is the ignorance of man the real crime of the virus? 

4.     The virus multiplies very fast because it wants to enhance its success and is that a crime? 

5.     The virus spreads fast because it wants to survive and successful like man and many other species of life form on earth and is that desire of the virus the real crime?

6.     Virus is a physical entity and hence can be prosecuted and punished but how about evolution?  How the scientists are going to bring ‘evolution’ and prosecute the evolution for favouring the new virus?

Before we file FIR and prepare charge sheet, should we not ask what is the real crime of the virus which warrants the world to abides to the recommendations of science and put the country inside cryo-fluid container to preserve human species from viral attack; POSSIBLY A LIFE WITHOUT LIVELIHOOD?  

What has been observed so far in most COVID 19 patients is self-defeating antagonism and self-destructive defence played by the immunity. 

Whether the virus has elicited such response or not is still not yet established conclusively in any animal model but based on such possibility assumption, charge sheet has been prepared and instantaneously judgment also has been passed against the virus to hang or poison or shoot the virus on sight and ensure total and complete death of the virus. 

Poly-phasic immune response is observed in COVID 19 patients.  Mainly blood coating is happening.  In strict evolutionary sense the coagulation of blood on entry of a pathogen is not that bad for our system. The blood clotting prevents further blood loss and repudiates the spread and movement of the pathogen. 

The real problem is memory loss of the feedback mechanism.  The blood thinners or anticoagulants are secreted in our body to prevent the blood clot beyond a threshold, which is reported to be lower in COVID 19 patients. 

Should we interpret such an event positively to prove the virus is not deadly because no deadly virus would ever drive the immune system to continuously clot the blood which is totally against the survival of the virus also at the end? 

The question is not about the small infectivity of the virus but can we treat the virus as the only pathogen on earth and freeze the freedom and livelihood to people in the name of pushing the country to lockdown to evict the virus?  

No person with grain of science would disagree to the idea that the virus is infective and much is not known about the virus and hence some extra care may be taken by the people.  Just sensitization alone is sufficient than putting the entire country under lockdown, freeze people from their livelihood in the name of war against the virus.

The earth is an equal opportunity employer and hence no species on earth can ever claim including man that it has more right than other life forms and has higher worthiness over other species of life. 

From the perspective of ‘equal worth norm’, the novel coronavirus also has its right to live and that is why man is failing miserably in his fight against the virus.  No life form on earth can claim it is supreme and hence man alone needs not face any challenge or threat.  Only to break such ‘pomp’ novel coronavirus would have evolved.

Every species must suffer adversity, must face extinction and before extinction, also has enough scope to procreate and the next generation would survive if it adapts, change and learn to live and let others live.  Certainly man failed in all his ethical considerations towards nature.

Look at the beauty of nature. Certain plants have developed a unique way to avoid competition called allelopathy.  But none of the species of plants with such allelopathic advantage could dominate the terrestrial ecosystem.  Symbiosis or commensalism among several species of plants and animals also has not given any great advantage to those species and all those life forms with and or without any such uniqueness also have equal space, opportunity and support from nature. 

In any host-parasite relationship, weaker the host, weaker shall be the survival of the parasite.  And healthier the host, healthier shall be the parasite.

In reality, from the evolutionary points of view, viral death shall happen only in those hosts whose immunity is already in a compromised state.  The immune response of the host towards the virus (subjects to further confirmation) in certain patients who are already suffering from various co-morbidity conditions is only killing the host and the virus.   

More the mutation, more the quasi species formation is likely to take place.  Such rapid mutations may occur mostly because the virus wants to survive. 

Imagine the two possible scenarios.  There are three mutants of the virus enters together into a host.  One of three mutants is highly virulent and infective, let us imagine.  If the host’s immunity is robust, the most infective mutant is likely to face severe competition from the other two mutants and the possibility of the virulent mutant getting kicked off from the scene is quite high. 

If the host is already suffering from severe co-morbidity conditions, the most virulent has best chance to survive but ultimately the virus too would die along with the host when the host dies.  The less virulent mutants also would die along with the host. 

In all probability, the extinction of the virus looks certain.  Quasi species effect, can we dismiss?

No adaptation advantage of any species on earth will be against own habitat but only likely towards the threat the species may face.  The possible threat the virus finds in some individuals may be hyper acting immunity.  Naturally the virus may be mutating fast to scuttle the hyper active immunity otherwise the virus may die along with the host. 

If the virus has evolved to stay, will naturally tries to conserve the host.  If it has come and then going to disappear in next season means we have nothing to worry about the virus in the next season.  Then the FIR must be not against the virus but against the evolution. 

Is novel coronavirus one season phenomena?

Man has misplaced his anger and frustrations against the virus.  High transmission of virus from one to another and the high rate of mutation should have be considered positively but instead, our scientific and medical fraternity has lost too much to the ‘newness’ of the virus and lost everything to the fallacy called novel.  Finally the science has to beg, borrow and knell before ‘fear’ because science had suddenly gone ignorant. 

Unfortunately the orthodox medical virologists, text book based epidemiologists and medical practitioners were hired for the job than evolutionary biologists specialized in virus and other pathogens. 

Only if we allow the less virulent viruses and a few bad viruses to mix with each other, the effects of bad viruses can be nullified.  Only when we free people with and without coronavirus and also those with mild symptoms (excluding co-morbid, COVID 19 patients), to mix with each other freely, the viral competition shall dilute and annul the virulent virus and the docile virus alone to proliferate. But our country has adopted lockdown, quarantine and creation of containment zones!    

Are we going wise or becoming pathologically fear burdened fear mongers?